Print Page | Close Window

Zaph on Scan Speak 18W/8531

Printed From: SpeakerBuilder
Category: Selvbyg af højttaler
Forum Name: Kabinet beregninger
Forum Discription: Her kan du stille spørgsmål omkring kabinetberegninger. Alt fra spørgsmål om betegnelser og metoder til alm. erfaringsudvekslen.
URL: http://forum.speakerbuilder.dk/forum_posts.asp?TID=155
Printed Date: 28 Apr 2024 at 13:12
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Zaph on Scan Speak 18W/8531
Posted By: Guests
Subject: Zaph on Scan Speak 18W/8531
Date Posted: 25 Aug 2009 at 22:30
Jeg læste lige dette på hans blog her: http://www.zaphaudio.com/blog.html

Scan-Speak 8531 enclosure size...
It is often discussed about what the optimal enclosure size is for this excellent woofer. For a vented enclosure, a number that often pops up is 22 liters with a low 30's tuning because at one time or another, an engineer from Scan Speak said this is what the woofer was designed for. Well, I've got to warn you folks: vented in a 22 liter enclosure is clearly bad advice - and it keeps getting repeated by people who think it's some sort of definitive number. What the engineers designed for and what manufacturing has come up with is often different, and in this case very different. I think I've tested about 8 or 10 8531's over many years and the average Qts is about .47 with a range of .4 to .55 - very far off from manufacturer's specs. My tests for T/S parameters are often verified with high level in-box near field response curves.

With the 8531, the best advice you'll get is to go big or go sealed. And even having said that, don't be afraid to go sealed as the 8531 has very satisfying extension in a sealed box. For vented, I think 30 liters is the smallest I would go, but 38 is even better, such as what I used in the ZRT design.


Synes det er lidt morsomt, jeg har hørt den i både 30L og 20L og jeg er ikke i tvivl om hvad jeg synes er bedst. Desuden lyder det lidt vildt at han måler så høj Qts, jeg har godtnok målt højere Qts end angivet, men langt fra så meget og det grunder også meget i min målemetode.



Replies:
Posted By: Meier
Date Posted: 27 Aug 2009 at 07:03
Hvad synes du så er bedst? 20L eller 30L ?
Hvad måler du af Qts (og hvad er fabrikantens opgivelser?)
 
Hvis der er forskel på målingerne, er det ofte forudsætningerne for målingen man skal kigge på INDEN man kaster sig ud i for mange fortolkninger - bare min erfaring Wink
Hilsen
Thomas


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 27 Aug 2009 at 22:16
Helt klart 20L med en portfrekvens på 33-34Hz som er den usxx anbefaler!

Den lyder da også godt i 30L, men den har slet ikke den samme fasthed, definition og frigjorthed som den anden afstemning.


Posted By: ronnie rasmussen
Date Posted: 30 Okt 2011 at 21:52
kappen, er det kabinet afstemning til en 2 vejs?

hvad ville du vælge hvis du skulle bruge den tl en ren melletone?



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com